View Single Post
  #4  
Old April 30th 04, 09:54 PM
House Widdershins
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hydrogrn Production From Nuclear Fission & Fusion

X-No Archive:Yes On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:41:08 -0600, "Carl R.
Osterwald" wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:22:15 -0400, Bama Brian
wrote:

* wrote:

On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 08:09:13 -0700, House Widdershins
wrote:

[...]

Nope. They talk about the research, and the hope of being
able to get a sustained fusion reaction, but not one of them
claims success.

Liar.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokamak

The first sentence at the site above says, "A tokamak is a toroidal,
(doughnut shaped) magnetic plasma confinement device, the leading candidate
for producing magnetic fusion energy."

It says LEADING CANDIDATE. That means nothing has yet been produced.

Go read your own citations.


Idiot. It is a working fusion reactor.


It is quite difficult for me to understand how someone's mind can be as
blank as yours apparently is, Alexa.

There's a new medical procedure out. The doctors remove the brain,
and spray it with Teflon (R) before sticking it back in.


Widdershins

Science, Logic, and the UFO Debate:
http://www.primenet.com/~bdzeiler/index.html

Three lies on one line.