View Single Post
  #78  
Old September 24th 16, 11:47 AM posted to sci.space.policy
William Mook[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,840
Default Paper published on producing arbitrarily long nanotubes.

On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 4:52:55 PM UTC+12, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote:

On Thursday, September 22, 2016 at 6:11:34 AM UTC+12, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote:

On Monday, September 19, 2016 at 1:48:32 AM UTC+12, Jeff Findley wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Saturday, August 27, 2016 at 8:42:00 PM UTC+12, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Robert Clark schrieb:

From Nanoscale to Macroscale: Applications of Nanotechnology to Production
of Bulk Ultra-Strong Materials.

I've been involved in CNT application development a little bit myself.

Let's just say it is _very_ difficult to get from theoretical properties
to practical performance.

That's not what's reported here;

https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs...mao_2012_p.pdf

And with the techniques reported here;

http://www.aerospaceamerica.org/Docu..._AANov2013.pdf

It's just like you Mook to dismiss someone with actual experience in the
field in favor of glowing research papers and reports in the media which
contain clear bias. Of course the researchers have nothing but positive
things to say in order to maintain their funding.


There is a difference between research laboratories and development labs which you are ignoring.
T

And there is an even bigger difference between labs of any sort and
actual working experience and tech. That is a much more critical
difference than the one you bring up between labs and you routinely
ignore it.


You're the one who refuses to ignore that global demand for CNTs is well established at 3,500 metric tons per year and plans are afott to grow that production by 600 metric tons per year - in China alone!


I've never made a comment of any type with regard to carbon nanotubes.


That's what I'm talking about you blowhard. If you're not talking about what I'm talking about, why the hell are you saying anything at all?

Please seek treatment for these delusions of yours.


You're the one responding to topics and refusing to discuss them. Take your own advice you freaking ape.




You have no appreciation whatever of the reality of what's going on blinded as you are by what you think is going on based on outdated materials.


You have no appreciation whatever of the reality of what's going on


Nonsense.

blinded as you are by your paranoid delusion


You're an expert in diagnosis are you? Somehow I think not.

that everyone who
disagrees with you and thinks you are a buffoon is the same person.


Look, I'm talking about CNTs and the fact that CNTs are produced as commodities today and have a large number of applications. That's what I'm talking about. Are you talking about this? You just said you weren't. So, what the hell are you responding to you ape?

You have done this over and over and over again and are once again
doing i


You have made the same mistake over and over again. Certainly. And play the same games over and over again. Get a freaking life you moron.


--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine