Il giorno giovedì 20 febbraio 2020 06:13:38 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha scritto:
On 19/02/2020 7:27 pm, wrote:
Il giorno mercoledì 19 febbraio 2020 02:41:18 UTC+1, Sylvia Else ha
scritto:
.........................cut...........

I repeat again: The scams are decided on the merits of the facts

E.Laureti

Why not allow device, and the experimental demonstration that it works,
to be examined by scientists of impeccable credentials, under a
non-disclosure agreement that does, however, allow them to say whether
or not they think the effect is real?

Sylvia.

This is what we are doing NOW with a view to the international patenting of PNN and its industrial development.

But unfortunately everything requires suitable personnel, experimental means time and unfortunately money.
But to do this it had to improve the PNN of 20 years ago to have a comparable boost with an ion engine. The primary advantage of the pnn lies not only in violating the principle of action and reaction but also in changing the first and second principles of Newtonian dynamics.
But these events are seen well only if the push increases.

I'm just waiting for the experimental events we're preparing to speak for me.

Quo Fata Ferunt

E.Laureti