On 31/05/2013 1:01 PM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:
'Yousuf Khan[_2_ Wrote:
“recycling universe which means a universe that goes from Big Bang, to
Big
Crunch, and then back again, over and over again.”

I have not referred the Earth and Moon as stars anywhere in this thread,
so something is getting twisted.

Okay, you're right, that was David Levy in the thread "Star Age
Measurements". My apologies.

In the case, my post; April 29th 13 did not make it clear, concerning
my view of recycling universe; I try to clarify; its based on the
concept where the universal matter is in the natural cooling cycle, from
the hot events to the very absolute zero temperature state, where the
mass of the matter only exists. This postulation is against the current
scientific view, because of the application of laws of the
thermodynamics, quantum mechanics and equation of E=mc squared.
Conclude, that the matter cannot penetrate into the true 0K environment.
My disagreement is based on the fact that none of the above components
are applicable to explain the behavior of sub atomic particles at very
lowest energy and temperature.

The reason that absolute zero is not possible is because the Universe is
a closed system, and all of the heat that was ever created is still
located within the Universe, it cannot escape to the outside, as there
is no outside beyond the Universe. The only way that the Universe is
cooling down is because it is expanding. By the laws of thermodynamics,
expansion causes cooling, while compression causes heating up.

Subatomic particles at their lowest energy level still have movement.
This movement is due to the quantum uncertainty principle, which states
that you can't tell both a particle's speed and its position beyond a
certain level of accuracy because the particles exist as a cloud of
probabilities rather than a definite and discrete single particle. In
other words they are just moving because they can't exist in one place
for very long.

Yousuf Khan