"Daryl McCullough" wrote in message
...
| Jerry says...
| "Androcles" wrote:
| http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html
|
| Albert Einstein (1879-1955). =A0Relativity: The Special and General
Theor=
| y.
| 1920.
|
| =A0"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
| K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --
| Einstein
|
| http://mcaaron.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/schleich_catapult.jpg
| Notice the cup is pointing tangentially.
| Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.
| An observer who is sitting eccentrically on a disc is sensible of a
force
| which acts in a tangential direction.
|
| NEWTON'S FIRST LAW.
| Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a
rig=
| ht
| line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed
| thereon.
|
| The lying idiot Einstein doesn't know the meaning of radial.
| Proven by experiment!
| Proven by peer review!
|
| Acceleration and velocity vectors are not required to be
| collinear. It would be a very boring world if they were.
|
| There is something reassuring about the fact that Androcles
| understands Newtonian physics no better than he understands
| Special Relativity.

There is nothing reassuring about a stupid bigot like McCullough
who doesn't know multiplication from division.
--
Peer reviewed publication.

http://ivanik3.narod.ru/TimeLifeMezon/301-305Nature.pdf

Bailey, Borer et. al:
tau = tau0 / [(1-v^2/c^2)^{1/2}] = gamma.tau0
Einstein: tau = t * [(1-v^2/c^2)^{1/2}] =
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img61.gif

Somebody doesn't know multiplication from division.
Somebody is cooking the books to get the result they want.
Somebody is LYING.
While no theory can be proven, it can be disproven by example.
Bailey, Borer et. al. have DISPROVEN relativity.

So much for peer-review.