On 5/26/2013 4:19 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
On May 26, 6:47 am, David Staup wrote:
On 5/22/2013 10:51 PM, Brad Guth wrote:







On May 22, 5:51 pm, David Staup wrote:
On 4/21/2013 7:36 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

On Apr 21, 4:04 pm, David Staup wrote:
On 4/21/2013 5:53 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

Terraforming the moon underground: (mining plus creating safe habitats
inside of that extremely tough crust) is not nearly as insurmountable
as you might think.

Besides the mainstream naysay gauntlet against folks ever exploiting
the extremely nearby planet Venus for all it s worth, it's as though
there is also something oddly mainstream taboo/forbidden or
nondisclosure associated with any notions of independently exploiting
the likely soft innards of our physically dark and paramagnetic moon.
Go figure that we re either being intentionally snookered or simply
misdirected by our oligarch peers.

Once TBMs(tunnel boring machines) are situated and working
sufficiently deep underground (other than remote logistics issues that
at first should be daunting), what's the likely geological difference
between our moon and Earth?

Inside the paramagnetic basalt crust of our moon is probably not going
to be all that much different than tunneling inside of Earth s granite
and much less paramagnetic basalt, especially once our TBMs get
sufficiently into and below that extremely tough paramagnetic basalt
and carbonado tough crust of 3.5+ g/cm3 that our NASA/Apollo era had
documented as offering a much lower density as well as perfectly inert
(not the least bit paramagnetic or hardly even mineral or other metal
worthy) and otherwise as mostly monochromatic as well as hardly even
the least bit dusty on top, and there certainly wasn t any problems
with the failsafe technology of their fly-by-rocket landers that can
be manually flown and easily scaled to suit pretty much any payload
tonnage. However, the greatly reduced gravity should by rights yield
a very soft or porous kind of moon innards, along with offering gas
formed geode pockets and possibly layers of mineral brines (even a
potential of hydrocarbons in addition to encountering a great deal of
fused crust sequestered helium), in that once sufficiently underneath
is when TBMs should whiz right through at a fraction of the difficulty
found in dealing with the inner bedrock of Earth.

No doubt the resident redneck FUD-masters and their oligarchs of
authority in charge of mainstream damage-control, by having to
continually topic/author stalk and otherwise sequester such
independent notions about exploiting our moon, are probably going to
need many extra Depends(aka adult diapers) in order to effectively
deal with their usual damage-control exploits of topic/author stalking
and trashing of this topic. Sorry about that.

Fortunately, we only have to be realistic in order to appreciate what
the inverted density or softer innards of our moon should have to
offer, not to mention my other notions of creating the LSE-CM/ISS and
of otherwise relocating the orbit of our moon as to actively station-
keeping it within Earth L1. At least Stanley Kubrick would be so
proud, not to mention most every global domination villain on Earth,
including those of our Paperclip Nazis that supposedly got us safely
to/from our moon without a scratch.

Figuring conservatively that fewer than 10% access my topics and
replies via Google Groups or Groups+, makes my global Usenet/newsgroup
audience worth at least 32,210 per week.

Google Groups: Your 7-day activity
14 discussions replies
29 direct replies to your messages
3221views of your messages
14 views of your profile

Not sure if this reported activity is necessarily a good or bad thing,
but none the less it seems to reflect that others are finding some of
what I have to offer as either worth their while or at least
entertaining. Perhaps there s not too many teachers or instructors
that would have nearly the same audience to brag about, and especially
those of my devoted FUD-masters as having an audience of roughly zero
once excluding others of their own redneck FUD-master kind that must
always brown-nose their oligarch peers, or else risk losing their
funding.

chuckle....

have you EVER considered.....
that the reason you never get any serious responses..
is the absurdity of your thoughts....

Not really, but I do understand that ruse-masters and FUD-masters like
yourself are a dime a dozen.

Are you suggesting that exploiting our moon or even its L1 as our
oasis/gateway and for accommodating the LSE-CM/ISS plus many other
considerations, are not worth considering?

Are you suggesting that saving Earth as a whole, its environment plus
countless lives and perhaps more than a trillion dollars per year, as
well as otherwise employing millions of us, is not such a good idea?

How exactly are you calculating that I "never get any serious
responses"?

Google Groups:
Your 7-day activity
14 discussions replies
32 direct replies to your messages
3240 views of your messages
15 views of your profile

What sort of 7-day activity report does Google Groups report about
your Usenet/newsgroup account?

Dude all those replies are from YOU LOL

You don't even understand how Google Groups works. That's rather
pathetic, because most Usenet/newsgroup readers are not even using
Google Groups version of accessing our topics, so chances are that
tenfold as many have actually viewed my stuff.

Your 7-day activity
1 discussion started
185 discussions replies
66 direct replies to your messages
6088 views of your messages
6 views of your profile

LOL..you funny goofy

pathetic...but funny

idiotic ....but funny

single digit IQ....but funny

need I go on?

Yes, we already know that you are the resident expert in pathetic,
idiotic and single digit IQ.

Why don't you tell us how you and others of your superior FUD kind
would go about terraforming the innards of our moon?

terraforming the innards of our moon?????????

chuckle

not that anyone would ever seriously consider doing it
but FIRST you would have to dig a very big hole...on the moon of course
then YOU crawl in and WE cover you over.....

sounds good to me


what an idiot.....hollow moon..LOL hollow moon or hollow head


and the answer is (drum roll)


you are a total idiot


hollow moon, goofy venus, tow the moon...


LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL