(bob haller) writes:
The bottom line, the risk that not looking, afterr having scherduled a look
will be a PR disaster if something bad occurs....

Besides, when dealing with a unknown major noise thats repetive better safe
than sorry shopuyld be the mantra/

BTW nowhere did I recommend a will nilly rush out the hatch. Just a pre planned
spacewalk completing the one cut short by the suit troubles. Well before next

The bottom line is that you value avoiding negative PR instead of
attempting a proper risk, benefit analysis.

You're still avoiding directly answering the question by inserting
your own assumptions. Answer this simple question:

If the probability of the problem being external, and leading to
death, is far less than the probability of death due to an EVA
accident, would you still order an EVA to check on the potential
problem?

It's a simple question, so just answer "yes" or "no".

Jeff
--
Remove "no" and "spam" from email address to reply.
If it says "This is not spam!", it's surely a lie.