The notion of 'climate change' is a symptom of empirical modeling rather than a topic in itself. The wider population wouldn't get it that there is no right/wrong with this type of modeling insofar as the individual can simply make up whatever story they wish within the confines of the rigged system.. In this case it is using the success of short term weather modeling bumped up to climate while trying to squeeze the Earth's atmosphere into the conditions found in a backyard greenhouse.


The issue has never been the strength of the arguments on the 'climate change' side but the weakness of the opposition. In terms of modeling it is impossible to deal with the modelers in terms of the 'universal theory of gravitation' as there is no yes/no or right/wrong as they give themselves unlimited choices, all that can be done is raise the standard of discussion, the standard of historical and technical details, the standard of imaging and graphics brought to bear on the topic - in this case the highly speculative modeling agenda itself.