On Mar 31, 12:39*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 31, 7:27*am, bob haller wrote:

theres no insurance cverage for us nuke plants that melt down, all
risk is on us government..

Consumers of products, services and Electric rate payers cover all the
cost, all the time.

in the case of a meltdown the government will be stuck with the costs
in the USA.

now imagine a meltdown near a major metropolitian area.

in the case of the plant near new york at least 8 million people would
be displaced, most permanetely.

the costs would be staggering

Consumers of products, goods and services, as well as Electric rate
payers have always covered all the cost, all the time, including all
that any insurance pays for.

For the same amount of energy, thorium fueled reactors wouldn't have
cost us at most 10% to date, and the whole damn world would have been
ten thousand percent better off. *So, why not go with the
substantially cheaper and otherwise more failsafe thorium fueled
reactors?

*http://groups.google.com/groups/search
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

you fail to get it, in the event of a fukashima or chernobyl scale
event the following are uninsured

all individuals since homeowners and property coverage exclude nuke
accidents......

the nuke power industry is off the hook too............

its all picked up by uncle sam