View Single Post
  #6  
Old November 29th 10, 06:40 PM posted to sci.astro.research
Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply][_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 137
Default microquasars (was: Stellar Magnetic Fields)

[[This discussion isn't really about stellar magnetic fields any more,
so I've changed the subject line.]]

Robert L. Oldershaw wrote:
(2) Also see the recent singular example of discrete self-similarity
between microquasars and AGN/radio quasars, which is in press at MNRAS
and is discussed he

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1124114711.htm


Thanks for posting this link, and thanks to the writers/editors of
that story for (for once!) including a link to the actual research!
They're talking about
http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0394

This is a nice piece of observational work, but it's not clear to me how
it's meaningful to call the their data "a singular example of discrete
self-similarity".

[The Earth is, to a reasonable approximation, spherical in shape.
Saturn is, to a reasonable approximation, spherical in shape.
Does this identity of shapes
[explicable in terms of the Newtonian mechanics
of hydrostatic equilibrium]
constitute an example of discrete self-similarity?]

ciao,

--
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]"
Dept of Astronomy, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA
"Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the
powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral."
-- quote by Freire / poster by Oxfam