On Feb 18, 4:05 pm, Art Deco wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 18, 12:31 pm, Art Deco wrote:
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:
That web page tells me everything I need to know - and that is, you're
an
absolute buffoon who will get on like a house on fire with the
saucerheads
as
you're another psycho head who salivates at the thought of disaster.
That
normally suggests someone with no ability to form human relationships.
Thanks for the visit, did you see this page?
http://www.xprt.net/~servitum/tlb/19bblsci.html
http://tinyurl.com/bat7e
owd
You're a bible nut. Therefore, you're nuts. Anyone who seems to think the
MMX
experiment is somehow related to Satan deserves to be pointed at and
laughed.
You're not exactly a glowing reference for the quality of science education
in
your neighbourhood.
I want to know what "Apparentivity" is.
Thanks, Art, for asking!
That one word: "Relative" is the root of Relativity. That is
"Relative" to the observer. Now replace 'relative' with apparent. That
is; Apparent to the observer, or "Apparentivity."
So it is something you made up, got it.
The word "Relativity" is made up.
I take it you don't believe
that two different people are able to make observations of the same
event and agree on what happened.
Apparently you asked a question, or made a statement.
Your point is?
Now every time you see the word "Relativity" just replace it with
"Apparentivity" and you will soon begin to comprehend that the "Theory
of Relativity" is a trick of logic and terminology whereby the
observer is made the center of all he observes.
Um, no. Special relativity can be derived mathematically from the main
postulate, that the speed of light in vacuum is identical to all
observers, regardless of the speeds the observers may have relative to
each other. Thus the term "relativity".
The "main postulate" is "made up" and it not a fact verifiable by
repeatable scientific experimant. The "main postualte" is based on
several assumptions.
In short: Einstein's Theory simply returned science to the earth
centric universe of Babylon. Einstein accounted for the evidence of
the rotation of the earth on its axis by the false assumption that the
universe rotates around the earth. (1.)
Obviously you don't understand what relative motion is, and I'm
guessing you've completely misunderstood whatever was actually written
in reference [1]. Also note that this book is apparently a history
text and not a physics text, thus to infer from it anything about what
relativity is or is not, or even what Einstein taught, is a grave
error.
I have always thought that Einstein intended this play on words
(relative motion Vs Apparent motion) as a joke, and it got away from
him.
This is an idiotic statement, and completely groundless -- Einstein was
a physicist who wanted to understand how the universe works. You are
accusing him of lying and fraud.
That conclusion is ony partially accurate. More accurate, I am
accusing Science in general and certain Scientists specifically of
lies and fraud.
Relativity is the biggest scientific hoax (see "Piltdown Man",
among others), the largest single practical joke, to be perpetrated on
humankind.
Patently false -- unlike anthropology, you can do the derivation
yourself, it isn't very difficult.
1. Mason, Stephen F.
A HISTORY OF THE SCIENCES
New York: Collier Books, Inc., 1962
"The Theory of Relativity was born of math errors.",
Webber, Charles L., Jr.,
CREATION RESEARCH SOCIETY QUARTERLY,
V. 11, N. 4, Mar. 1975, p. 221.
If this assertion was true, every physics (and math!) grad student
since the turn of the 20th century would have discovered the truth and
tried to publish the errors. Are you claiming there is an on-going
100-year-old conspiracy to keep relativity propped up on stilts and
hide the truth from the public?
Yes, exactly and specifically. Although to be slightly more accurate,
I believe and often say that this conspiracy began about 127 to 2008
(dates are, and must be, approximate unless we find some signed and
dated document.)
In general (and polite) conversatins I tend to date the conspiracy
from the false conclusions drawn from the MMX.
My own thoughts on this subject
http://www.xprt.net/~servitum/tlb/19bblsci.html
http://tinyurl.com/bat7e
owd
http://www.xprt.net/~servitum/
-----
For the Lord giveth wisdom: out of His mouth cometh knowledge and
understanding. Solomon