What is wrong with the 'Mainstream Scientific Establishment'?
On Oct 13, 10:59*pm, Timo Nieminen wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Androcles wrote:
"Timo Nieminen" wrote:
| On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Androcles wrote:
|
| Nonsense, that's simply radar. Use Greenfield's notation, c' = c+v.
| If the light hits the mirror at c' then it reflects from the mirror
at -c'.
|
| Ooh! Science from Androcles!
Yep, as always. Newton wrote three laws, conservation of momentum
was one of them.
| Not Ritz's emission theory then. Majorana's experiments (Phil mag 35, 163
| (1918), Phil Mag 37, 145 (1919)) support Ritz's emission theory over this
| reflect at speed of c' relative to the mirror emission theory.
|
| (Miller's Michelson-Morley with sunlight dis-supports both of
| those versions, in favour of c relative to the mirror, a "new source"
| emission theory.)
|
Ooh! Irrelevant drivel from Nieminen!
Experiments that falsify your preferred emission theory in favour of two
other emission theories are irrelevant? Androcles thinks experiment
evidence for and against theories is irrelevant? Ah well, that's the end
of science from Androcles!
(Btw, "conservation of momentum" is a good summary of all 3 of Newton's
laws of motion, not just one of them.)
|