View Single Post
  #104  
Old December 17th 08, 11:14 AM posted to sci.materials,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.space.policy,rec.arts.sf.science
Fred J. McCall[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,018
Default Can we now build the "space tower"?

Erik Max Francis wrote:

:YKhan wrote:
:
: Sure, that's why I said "until" which has an implied "if" in there.
: Anyways, I can see even unstable degenerate matter as useful, if only
: as concentrated explosives that can blow a hole through any normal
: matter. This stuff should pack more energy than either nuclear fission
: or fusion, but less than matter-antimatter reactions.
:
:Now you're talking about something else; earlier you said they would
:"hard." Degenerate matter has no "hardness." It's dense because there
:is a huge amount of mass compacting it into a degenerate state. That
:mass doesn't give it hardness, it just makes it dense. Hardness and
:density are not the same thing.
:

For an every day example of this, look at lead (or gold). Both quite
dense. Both quite soft.


--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson