View Single Post
  #64  
Old May 31st 11, 12:30 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Androcles[_43_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default Simple question about speed of force.


"Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
...
| On Mon, 30 May 2011 23:47:32 +0100, "Androcles"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
| .. .
| | On Mon, 30 May 2011 11:44:31 +0100, "Androcles"
| | wrote:
| |
| |
| | "Henry Wilson DSc." ..@.. wrote in message
| | .. .
| | | On Mon, 30 May 2011 06:06:14 +0100, "Androcles"
| | | wrote:
| | |
| |
| | | | I only reply to your messages because it provides me with good
| practice
| | | for
| | | | answering the more accomplished dickheads here.
| | | |
| | | I only reply to your messages for the laugh, Daisy.
| | | I won't bother to explain, your advancing senile dementia
| | | means you cannot appreciate it.
| | | Tell us again how Lorentz's 1/2 is identical to Einstein's 2/1
| | | and gamma means 1/beta where beta = (1-(v/c)^2)^-0.5, since
| | | that has you as thoroughly ****ed as Phuckwit Duck.
| | |
| | | Seriously Andro, take some advice from a friend, you have a terrible
| habit
| | | of getting things back to front... upside down even...It isn't good
for
| | your
| | | image...
| | | Try to avoid such errors in future will you.
| | |
| |
| | You want to get serious?
| | All you need do is prove your case, cite where Einstein ever said
| anything
| | about any gamma.
| | He did write
| | "Thus, whereas the Y and Z dimensions of the sphere (and therefore of
| every
| | rigid body of no matter what form) do not appear modified by the
motion,
| the
| | X dimension appears shortened in the ratio 1: sqrt(1-v^2/c^2), i.e.
the
| | greater the value of v, the greater the shortening."
| | but that's because was a ****ing moron like you, his own derivation is
xi
| =
| | (x-vt)/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) which is lengthening.
| | Seriously, you ****ing imbecile, if you are going to imitate the real
| | Wilson, try not to be such an obvious ****, will you?
| |
| | Lok A, it is a well known and accepted fact that according to SR,
moving
| | clocks run slow
|
| Yes, that is well known and is Einstein's claim, tau = t *
sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
|
| | and moving rods are shortened.
|
| Lok ******, I won't bother to explain, your advancing senile dementia
| means you cannot understand it. You mistake "well known" for
| "wrongly believed by Einstein Dingleberries everywhere".
|
| | Even little eric knows that.
| |
| | So it must be true.
|
| Lok ******, I'm only discussing Einstein's SR, not little eric's SR.
| Seriously, you ****ing imbecile, if you are going to imitate the real
| Wilson, try not to be such an obvious moron, will you?
|
| It's well past your plonk time....
|
| SR contradicts itself. Why try to defend any of it?
| http://www.scisite.info/wilson's_paradox.jpg
|
| Henry Wilson DSc
| Self-delusion is the Scourge of the SRian..

You need to fix that chronic form of psychosis, self-deluded SRian Wilson.
SR claims 2 is shorter than 1 in the ratio 1: 0.5
Wilson contradicts himself. Why try to defend him?