"Jerry" wrote in message ups.com...
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| "Jerry" wrote in message ups.com...
| | Sorcerer wrote:
| | "Jerry" wrote in message ups.com...
| | | Sorcerer wrote:
| | | "Jerry" wrote in message ups.com...
| | |
| | | | At the end of the article, Johnson explains the column headings and
| | | | the sign conventions used:
| | | | "In the (Measured) Radial Velocity column and Relative Radial Velocity
| | | | column, plus numbers mean moving away from Earth. The opposite is
| | | | true in the Acceleration column, where negative values indicate
| | | | acceleration away from us, toward the center of the star, or a
| | | | gravitational collapsing effect...."
| | |
| | | The guy is a ****ing idiot, just like you, he got the sign wrong.
| | |
| | | Try reading the quote, for once.
| | |
| | | Johnson used an OPPOSITE SIGN CONVENTION for acceleration.
| |
| | Try understanding reason for once. Read between the lines, or you
| | will fail psychiatry and psychology.
| |
| | Physics degree from Chicago...
| | What does that tell you? It tells me he doesn't have his master's yet and
| | copied his crap out of a text book, which is why the scanned gif is
| | blurred.
| | Totally unimpressive. With enough free parameters, you can fit anything
| | to anything. You need to show that you can explain ALL the data.
| | -- Jeery, 22 Dec 2006 16:03:58 -0800
| | THE GUY IS A TRANSPARENT MINDLESS PARROT, LIKE YOU!
| |
| | What does Johnson's degree status have to do with his ability to scan
| | a paper?
|
| So your conspiracy theory is nothing more than stupid mindless
| copying.
| Totally unimpressive. With enough free parameters, you can fit anything
| to anything. You need to show that you can explain ALL the data.
| -- Jeery the ****head, 22 Dec 2006 16:03:58 -0800
|
|
|
|
| | I find the small introductory images perfectly discernable
| | with the aid of the Windows Magnifier.
|
|
| You couldn't find a flaw in your reasong if it bit you in the arse.
|
|
|
| | The light curve varies between
| | approximately magnitude 5.0 to 5.9, in agreement with other
| | observations.
|
| So ****ing what?
| The velocity curve of your magical huff puff star is a Keplerian curve,
| mobster with the obstinacy of a glutted adder.
|
| |
| | You prefer a fully refereed paper to a brief online discussion?
|
|
| No, I prefer you to explain why the velocity curve of your huff puff
| star is accidentally Keplerian.
| [snip unwanted crap]
|
| YOU need

**** off, I do as I please, you do not give me assignments.
Explain why the velocity curve of your magical huff puff
star is accidentally Keplerian.

What Kepler thinks of your psychiatry:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Kepler.gif

Dog ate your homework... ****head?