"Jerry" wrote in message ups.com...
| Sorcerer wrote:
| "Jerry" wrote in message ups.com...
| | Sorcerer wrote:
| | "Jerry" wrote in message ups.com...
| |
| | | At the end of the article, Johnson explains the column headings and
| | | the sign conventions used:
| | | "In the (Measured) Radial Velocity column and Relative Radial Velocity
| | | column, plus numbers mean moving away from Earth. The opposite is
| | | true in the Acceleration column, where negative values indicate
| | | acceleration away from us, toward the center of the star, or a
| | | gravitational collapsing effect...."
| |
| | The guy is a ****ing idiot, just like you, he got the sign wrong.
| |
| | Try reading the quote, for once.
| |
| | Johnson used an OPPOSITE SIGN CONVENTION for acceleration.
|
| Try understanding reason for once. Read between the lines, or you
| will fail psychiatry and psychology.
|
| Physics degree from Chicago...
| What does that tell you? It tells me he doesn't have his master's yet and
| copied his crap out of a text book, which is why the scanned gif is
| blurred.
| Totally unimpressive. With enough free parameters, you can fit anything
| to anything. You need to show that you can explain ALL the data.
| -- Jeery, 22 Dec 2006 16:03:58 -0800
| THE GUY IS A TRANSPARENT MINDLESS PARROT, LIKE YOU!
|
| What does Johnson's degree status have to do with his ability to scan
| a paper?

So your conspiracy theory is nothing more than stupid mindless
copying.
Totally unimpressive. With enough free parameters, you can fit anything
to anything. You need to show that you can explain ALL the data.
-- Jeery the ****head, 22 Dec 2006 16:03:58 -0800




| I find the small introductory images perfectly discernable
| with the aid of the Windows Magnifier.


You couldn't find a flaw in your reasong if it bit you in the arse.



| The light curve varies between
| approximately magnitude 5.0 to 5.9, in agreement with other
| observations.

So ****ing what?
The velocity curve of your magical huff puff star is a Keplerian curve,
mobster with the obstinacy of a glutted adder.

|
| You prefer a fully refereed paper to a brief online discussion?


No, I prefer you to explain why the velocity curve of your huff puff
star is accidentally Keplerian.
[snip unwanted crap]


|
| OK, now:
|
| Your BEGINNING assignment,

**** off, ****head.