View Single Post
  #9  
Old August 3rd 15, 10:40 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Martin Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,707
Default My theory for the black holes

On 03/08/2015 16:33, Томислав Димитров wrote:
First of all - I got rid of my old avatar,I hope you will like the new(current) one.

So here it is... My whole theory is figured out after I done some huge research.
I'm going to start with the human perspective of a black hole - What

do we know about it?

Quite a lot. Laplace first conjectured the possibility of a gravitating
body with an escape velocity such that not even light could escape.

I mean do we even know what's inside?


Apart from at the singularity there is nothing special. Spagettification
will be a rather unpleasant experience but if you choose a nice big
black hole it won't happen anywhere near the event horizon. You will
just fade out from external view as you enter it becoming both fainter
and ever more red shifted.

We came out with the sure thing that they have enormous "amount" of gravity and they are very dense,daahh .


The singularity at the centre is infinitely dense and almost certainly
not correctly described by current theories but quantum gravity isn't
available yet. You will be very long, thin and dead before reaching it.

Their gravity is so big that all the light gets sucked in,right?


Not at all. Light can orbit around a black hole and the last stable
orbit for a non spinning BH is 3R but for a maximally spinning one eithe
R going in the same sense as the spin or 9R going against it.

Hollywood movies have a lot to answer for. Black holes are not cosmic
vacuum cleaners. If the sun turned into a BH tomorrow the planets would
still orbit it quite happily although the spin up would create a lot
more frame dragging and Mercury would suffer for it.

But my theory tries to explain why are they black.I mean if the gravity swallows all the light how can that hole be black.


It doesn't swallow all the light it merely never lets any light that
enters the event horizon ever get out again. Hence black.

It is a surface where any light that hits it is never reflected or
scattered this is pretty much a perfect definition of black.

The colors are product of the light if I can express myself like this.So,this leads me to think that they are kind of transperant.


The BH itself is black. Around it there is gravitational lensing as
light is bent by the gravitational field.

You may consider all of this nuts like I lost my marbles but it is all based on the blindness.
A blind person can't see light,right?And it is proved that the

blindness is not expressed through the black color,
I mean if you are blind you won't see the color black.As the blind

man can't see the light wherefrom he can't see the black color,
so the black hole's gravity sucks all the light until there is no

light wherefrom it can't be black.
So the only thing that's left is the transperant theory.So the

"transperant"(ex. black) hole shows
the things behind it but not that close from him I mean the distant

space.


So that is my theory.I do not know is it science-true.Can you give me your opinions?


Random word salad with a few buzzwords thrown in does not make a theory.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown