On Thursday 16 August 2007 16:32, Peter Teuben wrote:
So, random groups may
be old, but it works and isn't broken.
Yes of course. Rereading the FITS v3 proposal its wording
should be okay with respect to random groups as it is
actually a primary header.

My main concern is the wording of Sec. 3.7 which may open
the door for changes too wide.

Preben