Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 12:48:05 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 19:03:48 -0800 (PST), palsing
wrote:

On Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 4:57:35 PM UTC-8, Bast wrote:

Of course a signal from a satellite will keep requiring re-aiming,
where the moon farther away would not appear to move quickly from
your reference point on earth.

Just how quickly do you think the moon travels across the sky? A lot
faster than you think... since the Earth rotates through 4 degrees
per minute, and the moon is only about 1/2 degree across, it takes
the moon about 2 minutes to move its own diameter in the sky... so
someone pointing an antenna at it would have to re-adjust that
antenna quite often.

Man went to the moon, that has been accepted as fact across the whole
world for more than 50 years now. I saw it live on TV, along with
everyone else. Many have tried to disprove this, and all have failed,
every question has been answered. If you say otherwise, that would be
an extraordinary claim, and the burden of proof would be on *you*.
The video you offer is laughable. Got any 'real' proof? I didn't
think so...

LOL. Poor old delusional Bast. All her references come from old
sci-fi TV shows and cartoons.





I am trying to dumb things down so even you and Hagar can try
understand.

No one believes you, Bastie, your broken english aside. You're a
conspiracy whacko on the Internet and Hagar and I are both engineers.






Good for you.
So please get back to keeping the cans clean on your trash pickup route, and
leave the science to those of us who can comprehend it