"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
**inhaling deeply, enjoying this EXCITING and RARE breath of fresh
air** Thank you, CT. **smiling**

Note that Stuffie failed to provide even one verifiable reference, yet you
take his word blindly. That says a lot more about your investigative skills
than you realize.

It's clear that you have discovered that, contrary to your fervently-held
belief, your investigation amounts to nothing, because you didn't bother to
perform any real research. You might have read a bunch of stuff, from which
you drew a conclusion, then any further reading was of material that
reinforced your existing conclusion. It's abundantly clear that you have no
technical knowledge, or else you'd easily be able to answer rk's questions.
It's clear that your "team" exists only in your mind. It's possible (though
there is no evidence to support it) that you wrote letters to some people;
if they answered you, you've imagined they are part of your "team", and if
they didn't, then you've imagined they are part of some fictional
"conspiracy". Clearly, in your mind, anyone who doesn't immediately agree
with your claims, evidence unseen, in part of this "conspiracy".

You talk about all of the research you've done, yet you cannot provide any
*detail*. One of your claims was that you had contacted legal authorities
concerning what you had uncovered, yet you cannot seem to remember who you
contacted or what the jurisdiction was. Surely you kept notes of such an
occurence.

Really, what's happened is that you have discovered that your
"investigation" was nothing more than an infatuation, completely lacking in
any sort of detail, and completely failing to address any evidence against
your pre-conceived notion. You do not even show the level of investigative
skill you should have picked up from watching a few episodes of "CSI".

If, as you claimed, you had spent more than a decade of your life on this
investigation, yet had done so poorly that you cannot even remember the
names of your team, it's become clear that you are so emotionally
traumatized by the realization that you basically ****ed away your time that
you simply prefer to believe that everyone is out to get you, rather than
accept that we'd actually like to help you. We'd genuinely like to examine
what you've uncovered, but you have to share, and in order to do that, you
need to provide verifiable references. If you didn't bother to keep records,
that means that your claims are unproven. It's not enough to *talk* about
what you've uncovered. If you'd actually talked to legal authorities, as you
claimed, you'd have to provide them with verifiable evidence, which means
that, if you in fact did talk to legal authorities, as you claimed, you
*have* such evidence. If, as you claimed, you had talked to legal
authorities, there's no reason not to provide the same verifiable evidence
here that you provided to them. After all, if you did in fact talk to legal
authorities, as you claim, then you'd have to testify in court and provide
the court with the same evidence. In that case, you should welcome all the
assistance you could get, and in order to get that assistance, you'll have
to provide the verifiable evidence, instead of merely talking about it.

So, then, you can start by providing the names and verifiable contact
information for the members of your "team".

When you behave in a reasonable manner, you receive it back. So why not be
reasonable and answer the above question? What are you hiding?