Chapt26 MECO theory #1631 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Now the below is an old post of the 4th edition of this book talking about MECO and Tifft quantized galaxy speeds. In this 5th edition, much of the Tifft quantized galaxy speeds is thrown out, because it relies on Doppler redshift, and we learned in the 5th edition that all Doppler redshift is rather meaningless in terms of distance or motion of the object in question, since Doppler redshift is caused by light traveling through bent Space of the Cosmos, and is a Refraction Redshift, not a Doppler redshift.

Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.math
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:26:52 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Jan 16 2011 10:26Â*pm
Subject: MECO theory ... Atom Totality Theory

....Subject: which is easier for astronomers to analyze a MECO or Tifft 
quantized galaxy ?
Well, I said to myself that whenever a new important chapter 
of this book comes along in research findings that I should drop 
everything else I am doing and write a new edition of this book. 
When I started the 3rd edition, there was no new science 
information but then I realized there was great new information 
of the MECO theory which threatens to replace all black-holes 
with a MECO as the source of energy.
MECO was recently discovered and can be read about from 
this reference source:
--- Â*NEW SCIENTIST --- 
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...uasar-casts-do... 
Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes
So I need to rearrange the chapters as to this listing priority. 
Question: is it easier to determine a MECO from a astro object 
or is it easier to determine if a astro object has a Tifft 
quantization?
I am asking for which takes the most time and effort in analysis? 
A MECO or a Tifft quantization? I would hazard to guess that 
the Tifft quantization is easier to perform and takes less time 
from start to finish. Am I correct on that claim?
Subject: which is easier for astronomers to analyze a MECO or 
Tifft quantized galaxy ?

wrote:
I am asking for which takes the most time and effort in analysis?
A MECO or a Tifft quantization? I would hazard to guess that
the Tifft quantization is easier to perform and takes less time
from start to finish. Am I correct on that claim?

--- quoting ---
Observations Supporting the Existence of an Intrinsic Magnetic Moment
inside the Central Compact Object within the Quasar Q0957+561
Rudolph E. Schild et al 2006 The Astronomical Journal 132 420-432
Rudolph E. Schild1, Darryl J. Leiter2 and Stanley L. Robertson3 
--- end quoting ---
So the question I am asking is something that is usually not printed. 
I am asking 
for how long of a time span was it from the start of analyzing this 
quasar for MECO 
and end of the analysis with the conclusion it was a MECO. Are we 
talking of a 
5 year time span? Does it take that much time?
And suppose a group of scientists wanted to know if a specific galaxy 
has a 
quantized Tifft redshift or speed? Does it take 5 year time span?
I would hazard to guess it is easier to make a Tifft galaxy 
quantization 
analysis than a MECO analysis. I would say a Tifft analysis of a 
galaxy 
takes about 2 years whereas a MECO analysis of a object takes about 
5 years, but that is purely a guess.
I do suspect that each MECO confirmation carries so much more 
priority in astronomy than other confirmations because of its ruinous 
affect 
on black-hole theory. So not only does MECO support the Atom Totality 
theory 
but concomitantly destroys the black-hole and Big Bang theory.
And let me say this also, that the MECO theory has the aspect of 
a science that is very much ruinous of black-hole theory. What I mean 
is the characteristic, that if a MECO is found on just one star which 
was 
hitherto thought of as a black-hole, just one instance of that spells 
that 
all black-holes are really MECOs , just not confirmed as MECOs. Here 
is 
an analogy example. For much of the 20th century, it was believed that 
ulcers were caused by stress, and that stress is similar to the belief 
in 
black-holes. Up until some doctors noted that a special bacteria in 
the gut was noticed on a ulcer victim. Soon it was seen that this 
bacteria was also in other ulcer victims, and then lo and behold, we 
find out that ulcers 
are directly linked to bacteria. Likewise, when astronomy was 
primitive with conjuring up black-holes here there and everywhere, 
then one such case was proved to be a MECO, not a black-hole. So 
someday in the near future, the whole tidal wave of black-holes is all 
washed away because they are all MECOs.
Subject: took 20 years for the first MECO
According to this quoted website, it took 20 years.
--- quoting --- 
http://www.world-science.net/otherne...811_quasar.htm 
...galaxy, said Schild. Schild monitored the quasar’s brightness for 
20 
years, along with an international consortium of observers at 14 
telescopes. 
--- end quoting ---
But I think the 20 years was more than the determination of the 
magnetic 
field. I suspect that a MECO can take as little as two years of 
observation for a determination.
--- quoting Wikipedia on MECO ---
Magnetospheric eternally collapsing object 
Â*From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
Jump to: navigation, search
Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Objects or MECOs are proposed 
alternatives to black holes advocated by Darryl Leiter and Stanley 
Robertson. They are a variant of eternally collapsing objects or ECOs, 
proposed by Abhas Mitra in 1998.[1] Both models were based on 
ostensive 
proofs that black holes cannot form from the spherically symmetric 
gravitational collapse of a star, and that therefore a collapsing star 
must radiate away all its mass. The theories contend that the collapse 
will be slowed to a near halt by the resulting radiation pressure, 
forming a long-lasting dense object without an event horizon. 
--- end quoting ---
A new name to the MECO theory is Mitra, an Indian physicist, who 
apparently started this MECO idea in 1998.
What is needed now is a faster way of reporting that old alleged 
black-holes are simply another MECO, especially the Milky Way 
galactic nucleus.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies