Chapt26 MECO theory #1630 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed


The below was written in 2011 for the 4th edition of this book and now it is 2013 with the 5th. Much has changed since 2011, in that for instance, quasars are now seen as ordinary stars or galactic nuclei that are rather close and nearby to Earth and not far far away.

Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.math
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 12:37:07 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Jan 16 2011 2:37Â*pm
Subject: ...more MECO theory ... Atom Totality Theory

Subject: MECO theory would have a quantization of quasars per distance 
from Nucleus of Atom Totality
Journal reference: The Astronomical Journal (vol 132, p 420)
I had a read of that journal, and alot of the terminology is unfamilar 
to me and can only assume things. What I was looking for 
was more specifics on "...popping in and out of existence" 
and some clues as to the type of radiation and variations. 
The article suggested that "planetoids mass" was swallowed 
by the MECO and resulted in a 30% increase in UV radiation.
I had a look at quasars in Wikipedia for some information on 
whether brightness of quasars were correlated with distance.
--- quoting Wikipedia on quasars energy --- 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar
The emission of large amounts of power from a small region requires a 
power source far more efficient than the nuclear fusion which powers 
stars. The release of gravitational energy[citation needed] by matter 
falling towards a massive black hole is the only process known that 
can produce such high power continuously. (Stellar explosions - 
Supernovas and gamma-ray bursts - can do so, but only for a few 
weeks.)
Since quasars exhibit properties common to all active galaxies, the 
emissions from quasars can be readily compared to those of small 
active galaxies powered by supermassive black holes. To create a 
luminosity of 10^40 W ,or Joules per second, (the typical brightness 
of a quasar), a super-massive black hole would have to consume the 
material equivalent of 10 stars per year. The brightest known quasars 
devour 1000 solar masses of material every year. The largest known is 
estimated to consume matter equivalent to 600 Earths per hour. Quasars 
'turn on' and off depending on their surroundings, and since quasars 
cannot continue to feed at high rates for 10 billion years, after a 
quasar finishes accreting the surrounding gas and dust, it becomes an 
ordinary galaxy. 
--- end quoting ---

The Big Bang theory with its black-hole explanations cannot 
make sense of the fact that quasars are most abundant beyond 
the Sloan Great Wall and the most luminous beyond the Sloan.
But the Atom Totality predicts that to be the case because the 
most matter is dense around the Nucleus and sparse the further 
away.
And, the mistake made by the Wikipedia authors of the above 
is that they neglected "matter to antimatter annihilation" as the 
source of radiation. So that as a MECO swallows up a 
planetoid or a star, it in a sense converts the entire mass into 
energy. Only in an Atom Totality can you have matter to 
antimatter annihilation explaining quasars, because Space 
is the Dirac Ocean of Positrons and matter is of the "Atom 
Totality's electrons" So the two meeting in a MECO results 
in a quasar.
Subject: another proof of MECO theory would be the heavier elements 
like iron found in distant quasars
Easier evidence that the MECO theory is correct and the 
black-hole theory phony and also that the Atom Totality 
theory is correct and the Big Bang phony is the increasing 
data and observations of heavier elements beyond hydrogen 
and helium found in distant quasars..
If the Big Bang and black-hole was correct then the Universe 
is too young in its explosion to have created these heavier 
elements such as iron. But some of these quasars that are 
reputed to be from the Big Bang explosion are coming in with 
data that they have heavier elements beyond helium all the way 
up to and including iron.
So heavy elements for quasars spells the ruination of Big 
Bang and black-holes.
I will check the references to see the latest details 
of heavy elements.
Subject: Big Bang with black-holes on their last days in astronomy

Lofty Goat wrote:
On Fri, 22 May 2009 12:16:52 -0700, plutonium.archimedes wrote:

(snipped)

BTW, is there a good reason not to expect to find some iron around
distant quasars? Â*Not enough novas (novae?) before that era for much
nucleosynthesys, but at the temperatures within the accretion disc around
the black hole it might happen.
Anyone actually know? Â*I'm a little hazy about that (and about many other
things), but it seems like real physics might explain it.
-- RLW

In a Big Bang-- black-hole Cosmos, the further in distance means the
closer to the explosion event and the moment of creation when there
was
no heavier elements beyond hydrogen. So we expect to see
only lighter elements in the quasars. Also, there were no black-holes
after
the explosion, and this is where the Big Bang has alot of
contradictions
in that when does a black-hole form in a Big Bang theory.
In an Atom Totality, before the Plutonium Atom Totality there was a 
Uranium Atom Totality so the Cosmos is in layers of age. So we can 
expect elements of hydrogen all the way up to plutonium in quasars 
because the quasars were there 15 billion years ago and 20 billion 
years ago. And the name MECO is a pretty good term. Instead of 
tearing a hole in the fabric of Space that a black-hole purports, a 
MECO exchanges the antimatter from Space and uses the antimatter 
to annihilate ordinary matter. So a black-hole is a tear into Space, 
whereas a MECO is a protrusion of Space via a matter to antimatter 
annihilation.
To a reasonable person, it makes more sense that as you compress 
matter, it should not disappear into Space, but rather join up with 
Space 
and create a matter to antimatter MECO driven phenomenon.
Yes, I would like to hear how the Big Bangers waltz their way 
out of the contradictions of quasars at the birth of the Cosmos yet 
having 
black-holes fire them and having heavy elements when the Cosmos was 
so infant in birth. Â*I do not think the Big Bangers and black-holes 
can 
waltz and tiptoe out of their contradictions.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies