Chapt26 MECO theory to explain high energy sources and dispel
black-hole theory as science-fiction #1627 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed


Now the below two old posts were written in 2010 and it is now 2013 and much has changed as far as mechanisms of energy with the Maxwell Equations as axioms over all of physics. There are no black holes in New Physics and quasars are normal stars or galaxies nearby Earth and that the Doppler redshift is fakery, so we need no explanation of quasars.

Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.math
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:13:24 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 16 2010 11:13Â*pm
Subject: ... MECO theory replacing black-holes ... ATOM TOTALITY, ONE-ATOM-UNIVERSE theory

Subject: MECO theory to replace black-hole theory; book: ATOM TOTALITY 
(Atom Universe) THEORY

I don't know why sometimes I make it hard on myself. There 
I was trying to conjure up a 
mechanism for why the quasars when in the last edition of this 
book I had read about this MECO theory which offers to 
replace all black-holes and offers to explain any large 
amount of radiation in the cosmos.
Do you ever get yourself in that situation, where you look and 
look for a explanation, and yet it is sitting there in front of you 
just inviting you by saying "here I am."

http://www.newscientist.com/article/...uasar-casts-do... 
Â*Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes

Now I have to check into that MECO theory but it appears to be a Dirac Radioactivities theory where the particles slip in and out of the Dirac ocean of positrons or antimatter.
I am going to expand Dirac's Ocean from that of only positrons 
to that of being just simply Antimatter.
So when MECO theory posits the slipping in and out of particles 
it becomes a matter to antimatter conversion into energy and 
thus any high energy is emitted.
So this MECO theory is even better than the old black-hole 
theory because it is matter to antimatter conversion whereas 
the black-hole theory had to rely upon the stripping away of 
matter and for that matter to so to speak "fall into the black-hole 
to derive energy out of the falling matter". So that MECO is 
even stronger of a energy source than black-hole theory.


Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.astro, sci.math
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:24:59 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 18 2010 1:24Â*am
Subject: ... MECO theory to replace black-hole theory ... ATOM TOTALITY

(snipped)
--- Quoting in parts from NEW SCIENTIST --- 


http://www.newscientist.com/article/...uasar-casts-do... 
Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes

The researchers found that the disc of material surrounding the central object has a hole in it with a width of about 4000 Astronomical Units (1 AU is the distance between the Earth and the Sun). This gap suggests that material has been swept out by magnetic forces from the central object, the researchers say, and must therefore be a MECO, not a black hole. 
(snipped)
According to the MECO theory, objects in our universe can never actually collapse to form black holes. When an object gets very dense and hot, subatomic particles start popping in and out of existence inside it in huge numbers, producing copious amounts of radiation. Outward pressure from this radiation halts the collapse so the object remains a hot ball of plasma rather than becoming a black hole. 
(snipped)

Journal reference: The Astronomical Journal (vol 132, p 420)

--- end quoting from NEW SCIENTIST ---

The researchers were Schild and Leiter of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center of Astrophysics.
The term MECO is derived from "magnetospheric eternally collapsing object" and the physics involved is that whereever these high energy sources 
in astronomy come from, seem to have a magnetic field around them, something that a black-hole cannot have a magnetic field.
So the new challenge to astronomy is to examine high energy sources of stars or galaxies and determine if they have a magnetic field via gravitational lensing.
So, one by one, all the previous proclaimed and acclaimed black-hole objects are going to be swept under the rug of shame in science. Simply re- 
examine all those old proclaimed black-holes and find out their "magnetic 
field".
Now the MECO theory appears to be a version of the Dirac Radioactivities 
where particles slip in and out of the Dirac Ocean of Antimatter.
You can only have a Ocean of Antimatter sitting alongside a Cosmos of Matter in an Atom Totality theory, not a Big Bang.
--

More than 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google 
newsgroups author search archive from May 2012 to May 2013. Drexel 
University's Math Forum has done a far better job and many of those 
missing Google posts can be seen he

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium 

http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium 

whole entire Universe is just one big atom 

where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies