jonathan wrote:

I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic. But doesn't anyone find it
rather curious that Porter Goss suddenly and without
explanation quits the CIA. This leak over telephone
surveillance appears almost the next day that might sabotage
his replacement. Then, almost the next day, the number three
at CIA, that also quit, has his house raided.

I suspect the CIA wouldn't go along with the administration on
this issue and they got canned as a result. And the leaks are
payback. loks to me like Cheney and Rummy are trying to
bring first the NSA, now the CIA under the control of
Defense Dept yes-men. The repubs these days demand
complete loyalty, but they forget that there are still people
in DC that are loyal to the constitution first.

Nonsense. They are loyal to their hatred of the administration first.
Many in the CIA consider their war against the White House (and in favor
of preserving their bureaucracy) more important than the war against
people who are trying to kill or convert us.

If the White House breaks the law, sooner or later someone
is going to leak it.

There's no evidence that the White House has broken the law, or violated
the Constitution.