"bart janssens" wrote in message
om...
Alexander Avtanski wrote in message
...
Evidently, this guy have never seen the ISS... :-)))


What did you see?

Depending on the telescope and tracking, anyone with the knowhow can see
something like this...
http://www.astronomy.com/Content/Dyn...0/845hvkyl.asp

A stone, which could be a natural satellite?

Most definitely not.

Or was it a articifial satellite?

Absolutely.

Or do you admit there is NO visual difference???

There is a vast visual difference, namely structure, predictable position,
etc..

Now, go hawk your flawed theories to a group who doesn't prove you wrong
every clear night.
--
Stephen
Home Page: stephmon.com
Satellite Hunting: sathunt.com