wrote:
On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 9:01:14 AM UTC-4, Mike Collins wrote:
wsnell01 wrote:
On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 8:04:56 AM UTC-4, Mike Collins wrote:
wsnell01 wrote:
On Monday, May 4, 2015 at 10:13:31 AM UTC-4, Mike Collins wrote:
wsnell01 wrote:
On Saturday, May 2, 2015 at 3:54:38 PM UTC-4, Mike Collins wrote:
wsnell01 wrote:

The Medieval Warm Period is known by indirect evidence. The warmingistas
wish to use "recent" temp records since ~ very late 19th century to claim
an unusual warming trend. They should use indirect evidence comparable
to that used to discern the MWP. They don't.

They do! Study the methods and literature.

Incorrect, that is a "false fact!"

you can find the medieval warm period and the little ice age from this
table of greenland ice core data.

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/pal..._alley2000.txt

I had already suggested such a thing. However, in order to be
scientific, you must use modern ice core data to determine current
temperatures, and those of the last century or so.

If you looked at the table you would see the modern data which agrees with
modern temperature measurements.

Your table shows no such thing.

It does but with not many values.

The latest "reading" listed was .095 thousand years ago, ie 95 years ago.

When temperature data was available for comparison.