While reading in the bathroom on Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:46:32 -0500, I
saw that William Hamblen had written:

On 2004-06-08, LSL wrote:

Do they just crop them out, is the light too great, do they just
happen to choose photographs that have no stars in them for
aesthetics, etc.

The moon is bright and stars are faint so with the correct exposure
for the moon stars are underexposed.

Liar!

The moon is a fake, otherwise there would be stars. It's all really
set up on a sound stage in the Arizona desert.


--------------
Beady's Corollary to Occam's Razor: "The likeliest explanation of any phenomenon is almost always the most boring one imaginable."


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----