On Mar 27, 5:36 pm, Eric Chomko wrote:
On Mar 27, 3:10 pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Mar 27, 10:04 am, Eric Chomko wrote:

On Mar 27, 12:54 pm, Michael Gallagher wrote:

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:17:13 -0500, J Waggoner
wrote:

.... We all know
that the naysaying Moon Hoaxers will say its all faked .....

Exactly, so don't get your hopes up.

But we will have new data so they'll have to explain how it was faked
and maybe a few will actually believe that we landed after the LRO
encounter. Then again there may be that strange phenomenon where a few
believers become doubters but I suspect that that will bew few and far
in between.

Independent interpreted data that's peer replicated outside of your
hocus-pocus NASA isn't a problem, and never has been.

Brad, do you think that the Russians, who have sent numerous probes
and rovers to the moon, would allow the US nemisis to start/continue
with an Apollo ruse without exposing the farce?

Last I heard, it still takes two to tango.


What exactly do you want? If JAXA/Selene jibes with LRO, and proves
that we did in fact put 12 white men on the moon, will you then
repent?

Of course, but why the hell not having those 100mm resolution images
as of 10, 20 or even 30 years ago?

BTW, why not a robotic science platform of instruments within the
moon's L1, as such a deployment wouldn't have cost us 1% of those
Apollo missions, and to think the moon's L1 thing (with upgrades)
would still be ticking along as of 40 years and counting.
.. - Brad Guth