On Apr 24, 12:02Â*am, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
(snipped)
International Space Station ISS is a perfect platform to test whether
Newtonian gravity and General Relativity are fake physics and to see
if gravity is EM-gravity. I was reading the purpose or mission of ISS
in Wikipedia and it says up-front that the mission is science
research. Well, what better science question than to find out if
General Relativity is a fake theory and that gravity is EM-gravity.
Some data of ISS:
4.5x10^5 kg mass
perigee 402km
apogee 424km
orbital decay 2km/month
average speed 7.7km/sec
Alright, if Newtonian gravity or General Relativity were true, when
the astronauts were space walking to fix the Hubble telescope or
spacewalking on ISS, they would have been held to those objects
without a tether rope. If EM-gravity is true, then both Hubble
telescope and ISS have insufficient mass to form a gravity cell and
hence, no gravitational attraction and a tether rope is vital.
Now we can ask directly the astronauts who have space walked near ISS.
Ask them whether their sensation was a pull of the ISS upon them or
whether the mass of ISS was as if "it was nonexistent and not there to
pull on them"? I bet every astronaut who has spacewalked would say it
felt as if they were alone in space.
In EM-gravity, the tether rope is essential, because the moment a
spacewalking astronaut is a arms distance off the ISS, he would float
away and lost in Space.
I was looking at debris for the ISS and found one site showing a
reflecting body near the ISS. I am guessing it was a fragment of the
solar cell plate and the reason why it was reflective. So here again,
if Newtonian gravity or General Relativity were true, we would see
things, small debris objects sticking to the ISS as caught up in the
attraction by the ISS mass. But if EM-gravity is true, there is no
sticking to ISS no matter how small a mass particle and that there is
only linear momentum of objects in the vicinity of ISS.
So now, the experiment I want ISS to perform involves a small mass
such as a baseball or softball or bowling ball type of mass that has a
monitoring device so that we can track it or follow its motion and to
be thrown out by a spacewalker or by a rendezvous rocket with ISS. We
want to see if a Artificial Moon can be created for ISS because the
Newtonian gravity and General Relativity say that a Artificial Moon is
possible that orbits the ISS. However, EM-gravity says objects require
a minimum mass such as asteroid Ida of 10^16kg in order to form a
magnetic monopole gravity cell which has spin rotation of Ida and
which creates a bent Space around Ida that it can pull along a moon of
Dactyl. The ISS has only a 4.5x10^5kg mass and thus forms no gravity
cell. So that a astronaut spacewalking ISS without a tether would be
lost in Space.
Now probably, inside the ISS this can be tested by a remake of the
Cavendish gravity experiment, but it would not be as convincing of an
experiment as to trying to form an artificial moon for the ISS.
As I said previously, if Newtonian gravity or General Relativity were
true, then some space debris would cling to the ISS or to Hubble
reflectors inside the tube of Hubble space telescope and quickly cloud
the images seen because of debris clinging. We see no evidence of
this, and thus we realize that Newtonian gravity and General
Relativity are fake theories.
--
Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent,
simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies