Il giorno sabato 19 novembre 2016 23:52:25 UTC+1, ha scritto:
NASA's Physics-Defying EM Drive Passes Peer Review:

"The reactionless thruster known as the EM Drive has stirred heated debate over
the past few years. If successful it could provide a new and powerful method to
take our spacecraft to the stars, but it has faced harsh criticism because the
drive seems to violate the most fundamental laws of physics. One of the biggest
criticisms has been that the work wasn’t submitted for peer review, and until
that happens it shouldn’t be taken seriously. Well, this week that milestone was
reached with a peer-reviewed paper. The EM Drive has officially passed peer
review."

See:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/briankob.../#191c156f76e2



if the III Newton jumps or better circumvent

http://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/1.B36120

It is necessary also rewrite the I and II principle of Newtonian dynamics .... otherwise you end up with two problems of which I do not know what is the most :

1) violation of the conservation of momentum

2) violation of energy conservation

E.Laureti