Thread: Leaning tower of falcon 9
View Single Post
  #17  
Old July 13th 16, 02:09 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.physics,sci.astro
Fred J. McCall[_3_]
external usenet poster
  
Posts: 10,018
Default Leaning tower of falcon 9
wrote:

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
 wrote:

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
 wrote:

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
 wrote:

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
 wrote:

In sci.physics Fred J. McCall wrote:
 wrote:

snip

Ford sells the trucks it makes, SpaceX only sells delivery service.


Which is irrelevant to the idea of 'production'.

Correct; selling delivery service is irrelevant to the idea of 'production'.


But producing the ****ing vehicles to perform that service with is
not.

When "producing" is defined in an extremely narrow sense of the word simply
to provoke an argument.


You mean like what you're doing, where you have to narrow the
definition of "produce" to only include things put forward for direct
commercial sale?

Which is the commonly used definition of production when talking about
a company.


Bull****.

Yes, you are full of it.


No, I'm just buried under it from you shoveling so much.

Let me make it clear. Your statement about the "commonly used
definition of production" is incorrect. It is false. It is a lie.

Says you, tosser.


Says pretty much everyone but you, ******. Try buying a dictionary.
Try asking anyone who actually knows what SpaceX and the Falcon
booster are whether SpaceX produces the Falcon booster.


--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson