View Single Post
  #3  
Old August 18th 03, 08:04 PM
jeff findley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Scott (Kotex) Kozel

"Daniel Carolan" writes:
Many people on this group have concluded that your claims of conspiracy are
nothing more than the ravings of a crackpot.


Only those who are both informed and intelligent.

But readers who may be riding
the fence are not likely to take you any more seriously if you act like a
belligerent child toward anyone who shows resistance to those claims.


If you're "on the fence" about such a conspiracy theory, then you're
also likely to be one of those people who believe that NASA faked the
moon landings. I've talked to several such people in the past.

Again, there are those that are uninformed, which is easy to correct.
However, those that lack basic reasoning skills will believe just
about any half baked conspiracy theory. They're a lost cause. You
could send them to the moon to look at the remains of LEM and the
footprints all around and they'd still find ways to explain the hard
evidence away.

For example: 1960's era robots made the footprints, planted the flag,
and took off in the top half of the LEM to dispose of the evidence in
a fiery re-entry that just happened to coincide with the CM containing
the astronauts re-entering from LEO. Therefore, you can't believe any
of the physical evidence on the moon itself. NASA faked it all.

Sigh.

Jeff
--
Remove "no" and "spam" from email address to reply.
If it says "This is not spam!", it's surely a lie.