On Nov 9, 8:20*pm, John Gogo wrote:
On Nov 9, 8:18*pm, John Gogo wrote:









On Nov 9, 8:09*pm, John Gogo wrote:

On Nov 9, 8:05*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote:

you cannot answer a single question
for your *soi-dissant* theory of every thing.

thus:
I only found one thing, that relates the continuing rate
of supply of mel****er, compared to the recent *surge*;
"surge" is really the only applicable term, and
it could be because of "not the very first thing
that a French glacialologist thinks of."

there was a good survey article about this subject,
re Alaskan glaciers, in Eos, a few months ago;
totally non-extremist, Denierist or Confirmerist format.

thus quoth:
Because the amount of precipitation has not changed much over the
past
few decades, researchers blame rising temperatures for the glacial
retreat

Three-quarters of the Earth is ocean. *If ocean temperatures are
rising- that should be a major red flag! *That should be the canary in
a coal mine.

Or, maybe, there is no controlling ourselves.

Or, maybe this is just a 100 year weather cycle for which we are so
ignorant of?

Maybe, we could consider a 100 or 1000 times of human population for
Earth so easily to take? Maybe not. How do we begin to measure what
the Earth can take?