Atlas frugged, again;
that was as close to a definitive statement,
I've read form you.

alleged null results of the MMX mean the Galilean transform which
satisfies the principle of relativity is not good enough to describe
something that does not satisfy the principle of relativity. *The
subtlety is confusing more or less than nine of the physicists

do you mean,
the transform that satisfies the gallilean or einstein-poincare-
lorentz-etc. principle?