"Robert L. Oldershaw" wrote in
:

On Oct 5, 2:16*am, "Robert L. Oldershaw"
wrote:

I see. *So you see yourself as a warrior for right-thinking science.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
--------

INTERESTING SYSTEM OF THE DAY - 10/4/11

95 INTERESTING SYSTEMS OF LAST MONTH

http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/C.../A%2bARV/18.67

95 eclipsing binary stars, and the entire sample in part and total
disagrees with you. The stars are known to your demanded precision or
better, and all you did is sniff and move on when presented with proof
your theory is wrong.

Do you think the little 'oh I found a new star system' routine is going
to do anything except **** people off?


"PSR J1903+0327 : A Unique Milli-Second Pulsar with a Main Sequence
Companion Star"

http://arxiv.org/abs/1110.0507

Nope, sorry. This is an unacceptable observation.

1) The mass ratio is only known to about 10%: Note the mass ratio of R =
1.56 +/- 0.15. You've repeatedly asserted you'll only accept masses
known to 0.01 M_sun or better.

2) The mass of the system was determined spectroscopically, which you
have repeatedly said is 'unacceptable' due to 'systematic errors'.

3) The masses themselves are merely the most probable estimates after
reducing the value of chi^2 as a function of the observed parameters.
You have refused to acknowledge any analysis that disproves your
numerology that uses this so you would be a hypocrite to change your
mind now that you think it supports you.


Pulsar mass = 1.67 solar mass
Companion mass = 1.667 solar mass

Where are your error bars, Robert?


TOTAL SYSTEM MASS = 3.337 solar mass.

DSR PREDICTED MASS = 3.335 solar mass
= (23)(0.145 solar mass).

Relative error 0.02 %
Agreement 99.8%

At what level of confidence, Robert?

You can't answer this question because your reference does not put error
bars on the mass estimates.


Note also that this system is in conflict with conventional
astrophysics in that (1) millisecond pulsars are usually coupled with
white dwarfs, and (2) its eccentricity of 0.44 is unexplainably high.

A very interesting system!

Only because you think it agrees with you.

Where's your explanation as to why every star in the Torres sample
disagrees with you? Or why the sun disagrees to the tune of a hundred
sigma? etc...