There are a lot of empirical riff-raff hanging around the group which amounts to people who can't think straight,can't adjust or adapt to information or logic.

You have academics going to these institutions today who really imagine that the crust moves over a stationary Earth notion of 'hotspots' so that evolutionary geology becomes unworkable or at least the dynamic mechanism which leaves clues on the surface crust.

Astronomers are supposed to point out that all rotating celestial objects with fluid compositions have an uneven rotational gradient between Equatorial and Polar latitudes with the Earth being no exception hence the visual narrative shifts to it impact on evolutionary geology and clues left on the surface crust. The spherical deviation of the Earth is an added bonus to the specifics of this dynamic and how it meshes in with crustal evolution and particularly the Mid Atlantic Ridge but with no real astronomers around much less serious geological researchers there is no means to handle what effectively is an already observed mechanism of differential rotation.

Stellar evolutionary science is even more spectacular but with dull academics unable to adapt and adjust to physical considerations it is not possible to discuss anything worthwhile including the possibility that certain supernovae events precede the emergence of a solar system and a new cycle of the antecedent parent star.