Jordan wrote:

Thank you for implicitly admitting, by failing to address Simberg's
_main point_, that you have no defense for Chirac against the
accusation of yielding to this campaign of influence for essentially
venal motives.


Hey, you know how we are concerned about Iran, and how it might get
nuclear weapons?
Well, according to this 1999 article in The Jerusalem Post, we may be a
bit late on all this:
http://www.fas.org/news/iran/1999/980409-iran-jp.htm
We attack Iran, and this all could get _really_ interesting.

Pat