View Single Post
  #1  
Old July 17th 03, 08:31 PM
Rusty B
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars

Sander Vesik wrote in:


Apparently only 'landing humans on xxx' is what counts for some

people,
and thus its the only thing NASA should really (and especially budget
wise) pursue. And of course nasa would bae able to achieve more

once-off
show pieces of landing people on xxx if that was all it did. how

useful
that would be (or whetever it would in fact enhance spaceflight

technology
as a whole) is a completely different (and apparently not relevant to

such
people).


Sander



Sounds like the double talk NASA gives Congress at budget time every
year. Maybe they could invite you as a character witness. ;-)

So much for the book, "Learning English on $ 5.00 a day". :-)

--
Rusty Barton - Antelope, California