View Single Post
  #26  
Old January 20th 19, 03:35 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
RichA[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,076
Default CERN plans to build what the U.S. should have 23 years ago

On Saturday, 19 January 2019 09:39:03 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 19:51:31 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote:

On Friday, 18 January 2019 12:24:33 UTC-5, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:00:46 -0700, Jibini Kula Tumbili Kujisalimisha
wrote:

We don't need to sacrifice investment in scientific
infrastructure to build carbon sequestration systems and other
systems to minimize the impact of global warming.

Only if there's enough money to do both. People smarter than you (and
who isn't, you being a Chris and all) are skeptical that's the case.

There is enough money for both, especially when you factor in the
trillions of dollars of cost incurred by global warming.


Cold killed 5 million people last year.


Clueless.


Warmth saves lives, cold kills. Warmer environments increase numbers and diversity of life. The fossil record shows it, current tropical areas prove it. There is NO benefit in keeping the planet cold. The entire northern hemisphere from 35 deg up is only survivable because of human control of energy.