"Paul R. Mays" wrote in message ...

All I'm saying is there
is a lot of evidence .... is it absolute proof... nope... in
large part because we have a model that precludes the
possibility

how convenient. not only does your theory defy proof or disproof
(which makes it a nontheory, even on the art bell newsgroup), you flat
out ignore contrary evidence that falsifies your claim.


and will make even very good evidence suspect
for a long time until further evidence is found that answers
some of the questions raised by the writers and researches I
posted links for...

great idea. shift the burden of proof to people who disagree with
your claims, demand that they disprove your speculation.


I'm just pointing out that some people
want others to do all the thinking and foot work while all
they can do is rant without even looking at evidence
provided because they didn't get a committee to tell them
the evidence is OK...


you're just crying Konspiracy, a standard tactic of kooks everywhere.