Venus for dummies (1.0) / Brad Guth (GuthVenus)
On May 31, 3:38*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
How can the planet Venus be so insurmountable?
If others can manage to exploit Venus, then why can't those of us?
Be my guest and apply your very own photographic enlargement software,
as to viewing this one small but rather interesting mountainous area
of Venus, using your independent deductive expertise as to enlarge or
magnify this extensively mountainous terrain of Venus that I’ve
focused upon, really shouldn’t be asking too much. *Most of modern
PhotoZoom and numerous other photographic software variations tend to
accomplish this enlargement process automatically (including iPhone
and Safari image zooming), although some extra applied filtering and
thereby image enhancing for dynamic range compensations (aka contrast)
can further improve upon the end result (no direct pixel modifications
should ever be necessary, because it’s all a derivative from the
original Magellan radar imaging of 36 confirming radar scans/pixel,
that can always be 100% verified).
“GuthVenus” 1:1, plus 10x resample/enlargement of the area in
question:
*https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...Guth#slideshow....
*http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif
*https://picasaweb.google.com/1027362...8634/BradGuth#
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG, Guth Usenet/”Guth
Venus”, GuthVenus
On Apr 24, 2:28*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
Apparently, science nerds are supposed to be extremely narrow mindset
and typically failsafe as harmless cranks that never act out or
actually do anything aggressive, and because any context of off-world
geology remains yet another faith-based taboo/nondisclosure topic
policy of Usenet, whereas anything getting posted as open context
pertaining to the ongoing research and discovery of any weird geology
or the odd sorts of physics necessary for creating such highly unusual
geodynamics of such symmetrical and even somewhat community
infrastructure looking items (that by rights should not exist), is
simply of what’s not being allowed to go public or much less into any
of our K-12 indoctrinated mindsets. *Oddly, we can’t even seem to
openly discuss exploiting the likely inverse density innards of our
moon.
Surely there must be at least one geophysics qualified expertise
that’s willing to contribute his/her feedback, on behalf of
interpreting whatever these highly unusual geometrical items as having
been identified on the extremely hot surface of Venus could represent,
and/or at least given us some terrestrial examples that are clearly of
perfectly natural formations for the rest of us to compare, in order
to disqualify these rather numerous odd items as representing anything
but perfectly natural formations.
Sadly I’ve been asking this of our NASA, as well as multiple other
public funded agencies and always giving an open channel to anyone
else willing to give this one image of GuthVenus their best shot in
the dark, or even their best geology swag. *Apparently they’ve all
needed better than 12 years in order to decide what to do next.
Pay no special attention to those hiding behind curtains (cloaked as
always politically and faith-based correct), because it's their mostly
public-funded and/or faith-based job to topic/author stalk and to
otherwise FUD everything to death. *Hitler had the exact same
“Paperclip” team of ruse-masters and FUD-masters, as professional
media damage-control clowns working and/or manipulating the locals
into a mainstream status-quo mindset of always following order, which
unfortunately far too many have bought into instead of taking any
logically deductive formulated stance against their totally bat****
crazy peers.
Of course this mainstream status-quo policy of obfuscation and denial
is what brought us a mutually perpetrated cold-war era and the sort of
negative Karma likes of 911 (make that a whole lot of positive Karma
if you are an oligarch of our military industrial complex), each of
which wasted decades and costing us trillions of our hard earned
dollars, as well as having systematically squandered all sorts of
talent, expertise and resources that we'll never get back, and which
also forced other nations to follow suit.
Venus is pretty much as hot and nasty as we’ve all been indoctrinated
about. *However, this not necessarily the case of each and every
location, such as mountainous and polar areas can be considerably
cooler though still extremely hot by the sorts of human Goldilocks
standards that we’re accustomed to. *However, with applied physics and
reasonable technology, the surface of Venus can be dealt with, at
least robotically, and otherwise via composite rigid airships it can
be further exploited while easily protecting the airship crew. *Of
course you have to think really big and perhaps even small in order to
fully appreciate the potential of what exploiting such a nearby planet
has to offer, because it’s the in-between stuff that’s not easily
accomplished if you can only think of terrestrial limited methods that
we get to deal with on Earth.
Our physically dark and naked moon is just another metallicity
treasure trove of valuable resources (including much clean energy),
that’s just sitting out there and causing us mostly grief and
otherwise contributing very little terrestrial benefit, unless added
IR, X-rays and gamma plus loads of tidal surging and increased seismic
trauma is desirable.
Venus on the other hand is a lot more stable, and it isn’t traumatized
by any moon, as well as offering terrific buoyancy for airships,
nearly ideal protection from meteors and even most asteroids can’t
hardly touch that surface unless they’re mostly of iron and other
heavy metals. *You also can’t get any skin cancer from too much UV,
and local radiation issues have to be nearly zilch unless you’re
directly sitting on a pile of uranium and thorium. *The list of
positive attributes simply outnumbers the bad stuff by a good 10:1,
although if stuck with a naysay closed mindset, there’s no amount of
positive/constructive benefits that’ll ever budge or pry such closed
mindsets open.
Surely there must be at least one geophysics qualified expertise
that’s willing to contribute his/her feedback on what these highly
unusual geometrical items could represent, and/or at least given some
terrestrial examples that are clearly of perfectly natural formations,
for the rest of us village idiots as outsiders to compare.
Oddly the supposed image interpreting expertise of those public funded
is sadly nonexistent, so perhaps we should not trust anything we’re
being told by the world of mainstream experts about any other planet
or moon. *They can’t even seem to independently discuss odd formations
on our moon, nor the various gasses given off by our monochromatic
(aka colorless) moon that our NASA/Apollo era supposedly got a
firsthand look-see at.
If we have to accept that Kodak film is every bit as good as our
conditional physics via our cold-war NASA/Apollo era claims, and we
otherwise have to accept each and every officially published word
about our physically dark and naked moon being only as what they have
to say it is, then perhaps we might as well accept that Venus is just
another Muslim ruse, and that absolutely nothing of any importance or
value is ever going to be represented by Venus regardless of whatever
36 confirming radar scanned images has to offer. *In other words, not
so much as any radar obtained pixel of Venus can be trusted as to
represent any geology formations of surface rock, mountains, canyons
or that of anything else, but otherwise Kodak film can always be
trusted regardless of the local lighting, extreme contract issues,
lack of dynamic range and those always pesky IR to gamma radiation
issues.
What isn’t well understood about Venus is perhaps more interesting
than what little we do know, even if GuthVenus is looking every bit as
unnatural as it seems. *It’s a case of using our deductive reasoning
subjectivity, as for filling in the blanks and connecting the dots
with the best available science in order to interpret what surface
formations have to offer. *Of course the mainstream status-quo of
diehard naysayers will gladly obfuscate their butts off before
allowing an outsider to get an inch or any gram of credit for
uncovering anything, because that’s their job.
*“Ever-Changing Venus Superstorm Sparks Interest”
*http://news.yahoo.com/ever-changing-...arks-interest-...
*“Venus And Her Layers Of Carbon Dioxide”
*http://suyts.wordpress.com/2012/04/0...ers-of-carbon-...
*“The takeaway on all of this….. models and the theories behind them
are very useful when postulating new thoughts. *But, only if they
include the realities science has already given us. *And lastly, in
all science, regardless of the school of thought, observation is
king. *It always has been, it always will be. *You can model, theorize
and postulate until the cows come home but none of that matters when
observation tells you otherwise.”
There’s actually quite a bit of *old but perfectly reliable science
interpretation within that blog of “Suyts Space”, and you certainly do
not have to agree with all of it. *Without more robotic obtained
science at specific altitudes and surface locations, it’s still hard
to interpret or even swag as to what that planet has to offer.
Are you afraid to even look?
|