View Single Post
  #26  
Old July 6th 04, 03:55 PM
vonroach
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default SR time dilation on remote objects ?

On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 09:22:11 +0200, Bjoern Feuerbacher
wrote:

vonroach wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 10:15:42 -0700, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" N:
dlzc1 D:cox wrote:


The only evidence of the Big Bang is written at the observational the
limits of the Universe, namely the CMBR. Which indicates the Big Bang was
everywhere.

David A. Smith


But `everywhere' was hypothesized to be a `singularity'.


1) "singularity" is not necessarily the same as "point".
2) Probably there never was a singularity - at very high gravitational
fields (i.e. very high densities, close to the Big Bang) Quantum Gravity
effects should become important, and that could avoid a singularity. We
don't know yet.


Do you know what hypothesize means? As you state we do not know. Even
`probably' is an exaggeration. Gravitational fields, quantum gravity,
are speculative which means the subject of thought, experiment, and
theorizing. Your very high densities, I interpret to mean very
concentrated matter, and very concentrated mass/energy, and any
`space' present would also be very tightly compacted. A point has no
dimension, only location. A singularity is a vague concept that
implies very dense space/matter in very compact `space'.
Do you think a `singularity' is ever a `point'? I don't believe that
is the case. I don't recall using the term `point'.

Space is
thought to have expanding ever since. The CMBR supports the Big Bang
theory.


Nice that we agree on that.

But not necessarily at the same rate?
ta ta
Bye,
Bjoern