On Sep 11, 2:39*pm, eric gisse wrote:

This is not science.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

We have one stellar system for which the total mass and the masses of
the subsystems are measured dynamically to a high degree of accuracy:
the Solar System.

The Solar System's total mass agrees with the prediction of Discrete
Scale Relativity at the 99.987% level.

I notice that you make no mention of this one solid piece of evidence
that is already available.

Why would you put so much emphasis on the two poorly constrained
masses of the systems you mention above, but ignore the more accurate
Solar System data?

Do the mass estimates for the Solar System qualify as science, in your
worldview?

Do you agree that the Solar System's mass is extremely close to one of
DSR's predicted discrete masses?

Or will you assure us that it is off by an astronomical number of
standard deviations?

RLO
Discrete Scale Relativity