Le 29/04/2017 à 14:53, Jeff Findley a écrit :
In article , says...

Le 28/04/2017 à 08:55, JF Mezei a écrit :
Mars environment makes it unlikely there is life forms as we know them.

Surface environment is very different, yes.

But underground there is abundant water, rests of volcanic activity
providing possible nutrients, pressure is higher, temperatures are
higher than the surface, and the environment could provide for numerous
life forms.

Theory and conjecture, not fact.

Jeff


Methane is unstable in the surface of Mars. Something must be producing
it, surely some joker that has hidden methane under the surface to lead
NASA into error.

The fossils formations recognized by biologists?

Hallucinations produced by smoking pot and writing scientific papers at
the same time.

Magnetite of biological purity found in mars meteorites?

Pure contamination of course.

The circadian rhythms found in Viking data?

Poppycok, as McCall loves to say.

The rock facing the Viking lander becomes more green in spring and the
spectra of the rock is similar to the spectra of lichens?

[put some stupid remark here]

NASA acknowledges that organic matter exists in the surface of mars?

[just put one sentence. No arguments of course]

Since NASA doesn't look for life, only for geology, and nobody expects
to find anything, all hints are ignored.

What is annoying is the absolute zero degree of this discussion.

"Theory and conjecture, not fact"

That's all you have to say? The peer reviewed papers? Nothing.

What is the point of discussing if you just throw sentences around
whithout any argumentation?