If you were so concerned about screwups, then why haven't you answered my
previously asked question about management meetings? What hard evidence can
you provide that, if NASA management had met according to your demands (that
is, held meetings according to your interpretation of the rules even if they
would not have been productive), things *would have* turned out differently
for Columbia?

Your silence on the matter is nothing more or less than an admission on your
part that you are wrong.


Well NASA has now been instructed to hold the meetings as they were supposed
to.

Of course the managers cant ignore problems and dismiss them as not a issue
like linda ham did.