On Friday, January 10, 2014 10:01:34 AM UTC-5, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:
'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote:
;1261229']On 1/6/2014 10:51 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:-
'Brad Guth[_2_ Wrote:-
;1261145']On 1/4/2014 10:23 AM, JAAKKO KURHI wrote:-
There is reasonable doubt about what nuclear binding energy is and
where it comes from. The logical source is gravity, where the pull
force
would replace the binding action. But this scientifically confirmed
weak force is no match to nuclear energy. Hence, there has to be a
better way to make nuclear binding energy from the pull force of
gravity. Here is a solution, the force of gravity when applied to
molecular matter is calculated from mass and the distance between two
objects. However, the available nuclear energy has to be viewed from a
different perspective. In molecular matter, nucleuses of atoms are
separated by clouds of electrons, creating distance between nucleuses
in the molecule. On the other hand, the nucleus of a single atom has
no space between mass components. Hence, the pull force within the
nucleus system can be exponentially higher, equaling energy required
to split the nucleus of an atom to its component parts. Therefore,
gravity would be the source for nuclear binding force in the nucleus
and
equal to the level of obtained nuclear energy.
Jaakko Kurhi
-
Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together
and
there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what
exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with
anything
(not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained)
Aether seems to defy all the known laws of physics, because it is
absolutely everywhere and everything else has to displace aether,
making
this invisible and undetectable aether a push rather than a pulling
force.-
Except that we can put all the helium atoms of our universe together
and
there would be hardly if any binding force to speak of. So, what
exactly is gravity(?), especially when helium doesn't bind with
anything
(not even with itself unless it is being artificially contained)
Dear Brad Guth, you may have misunderstood the subject of this post.
I am talking about a much smaller entity than a helium atom, in this
case it can be a nuclear of the helium atom.
To be more exact the question is, is it a binding energy or is it a
binding force that binds the nuclear of the atom together.
For example, Is it nuclear energy or the pull of gravity that can be
equal to nuclear energy
when the force of gravity works within the structure having no space in
between objects.
Jaakko Kurhi
-
It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with
Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755.
It could be aether forcing everything together. Check with
Usenet/newsgroup contributor mpc755.
Mass is a smallest known and active entity in the universe.
The creature who can come up with a formula to convert aether (?) to
mass,
solves the greatest secret of the universe.
JK
--
JAAKKO KURHI
Ether and the Theory of Relativity
http://www.tuhh.de/rzt/rzt/it/Ether.html
"Since according to our present conceptions the elementary particles of matter are also, in their essence, nothing else than condensations of the electromagnetic field"
The electromagnetic field is a state of the aether.
Particles of matter are condensations of aether. Aether has mass.
'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf
"If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2."
The mass of the body does diminish. However, the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished; it still exists, as aether. Matter evaporates into aether. As matter evaporates into aether it expands into neighboring places; which is energy. Mass is conserved.
When a nuclear bomb explodes matter evaporates into aether. The evaporation is energy. Mass is conserved.