On Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:14:40 PM UTC-7, bringyagrogalong wrote:
Thomas Heger wrote:
bringyagrogalong wrote::
No prizes for guessing which one is missing.
Well, moon landing fake proves are kind of a sport.
I think, it takes a very good and profound proof, otherwise it wouldn't
convince anybody.
E.g.
look at this iconography picturehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aldrin_Apollo_11_original.jpg
But something IS odd:
Look at the visor of Aldrin.
You see his own shadow, as a distorted picture, reflected in the visor.
But you see also the real shadow, because it is on the photo, too.
Only both do not match. That is: the shadow itself and its reflection in
the visor are different.
In the visor it points to Armstrong, while on the ground it points sideways.
TH
The thing that strikes me about that photograph is that the shadow
shows that the sun is behind Aldrin yet the front of him is bathed in
light.
For further information about dodgy photographs, check this out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6Mvc...eature=related
It's convenient that the original high quality video footage of the
moon
landing was tossed out so as to avoid close scrutiny. Still, as
NASA
said, they didn't think it was important.
Blueprints, design and development drawings of the machines
involved
and telemetry tapes have also vanished. Dr. David Williams
(NASA
archivist at Goddard Space Flight Center) and Apollo 11 flight
director Gene Kranz both acknowledged that the Apollo 11 telemetry
data tapes are missing.
If you ever doubted that the first moon mission was staged then the
loss of the original video footage, blueprints and other
documentation
certainly suggests it.
One doesn't just "lose" such priceless material.
And if you want further proof that Apollo 11 didn't put men on the
moon...
http://tinyurl.com/cgv6z9l
There's a great deal about the Apollo era that still doesn't add up.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth,Brad_Guth,Brad.Guth,BradGuth,BG,Guth Usenet/”Guth Venus”