"jacob navia" wrote in message
...
| Le 04/09/11 10:29, Androcles a écrit :
| "jacob wrote in message
| ...
| | Le 03/09/11 22:21, Androcles a écrit :
| | "jacob wrote in message
| | ...
| | | Problem is, that physics is an experimental science.
| | |
| | | Relativity is confirmed by an incredible number of experiments.
| | |
| | Problem is, you are an ignorant lying bigot and a dumb****.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | "Androcles" is unable to put forward any arguments, as
| | always. Just insults, polemic, whatever.
| |
| ****head "jacob navia" just argues without a shred of evidence, as
always.
| Just assertion, bull****, whatever.
| Here's an argument, you ****ing imbecile, and you have no logical
| answer, you can't read mathematics.
| http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...uons/Muons.htm
|
| OK, I went to that page and in the article *YOU* cite I can read:
|
| quote
| The previous Muon Storage Ring experiment at CERN reported a value of
| the muon lifetime in flight for a relativistic factor of approx 12
| which agreed within 1% with the predicted value obtained by applying
| the above Einstein time dilation factor to the measured lifetime at
| rest. Here we report separate measurements for mu+ and mu- with a factor
| of 29.33, which are an order of magnitude more precise and which show
| that the predictions of special relativity obtain ever under
| accelerations as large as 10e18g and down to distances less than
| 10e-15cm.
| end quote
|
| In that article the scientists produce yet another experimental
| confirmation of relativity.

Bwhahahaha!
The mean life of a muon is 64 microseconds and NOBODY has measured
it to be any different. Here comes a muon, lifetime 64 usec.
SR say it should be 2.2 usec at rest, so it must be zipping along and
time dilated back up to 64 usec! SR proves SR!
You are ****ing mad if you believe that ****.

You can't do the math anymore than the morons could in the paper I cited.
Asserting what they assert doesn't mean diddly squat, dumb****! You
didn't read what I wrote about it, did you, ya ****ing imbecile?
****head "jacob navia" just argues without a shred of evidence, as always.
Just assertion, bull****, whatever.