Plus Bill, there would be the factor of young eyes vs. the 60 year
old eyes....the younger the eyes, that would be the automatic
winner! At 60+, I'll give up right now! (or just won't participate).
TW.





Bill Meyers wrote:
I believe this is logically impossible. I believe that you can't
maximize two components of a system in this way, unless they correlated
at 1.0 You can however ask the question, who can find the faintest
fuzzies with a given level of equipment, or you can ask the question who
can find a given magnitude of faint fuzzies with the cheapest equipment.

It's the same fallacy as the best car for the least money.
I suppose you could try to get around it with a ratio of fuzzieness to
cheapness and try to maximize this.
Bill Meyers

Scribe2b wrote:


there should be a marathon.
who can find the most faint fuzzies with the cheapest equipment?
KEWL
jc