View Single Post
  #1  
Old January 24th 09, 08:58 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Fred J. McCall[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,018
Default The end of Constellation?

Ian Parker wrote:

:On 24 Jan, 19:04, Fred J. McCall wrote:
: Ian Parker wrote:
:
: :On 23 Jan, 15:51, (Rand Simberg) wrote:
: :
: : * *Does it affect things that the shuttle does not, in the real
: : world, carry two tons of lead? *
: :
: : It does in Loonyland. *That's all that matters to Ian.- Hide quoted text -
: :
: :
: :The main contradiction of Republican land is that they believe in free
: :enterprise whenever help for the less fortunate/health care is
: :discussed, yet when space is discussed they eulogise command economics
: :as if it were the best thing since sliced bread.
: :
:
: Ian REALLY doesn't read what people say, does he?
:
: :
: :The Shuttle cost twice as much per Kg @ LEO as Ariane and considerably
: :more than the Russian launchers.
: :
:
: And so we see the "main contradiction" of the Lefty Loon - US
: government effort bad. *Point to Yurp and Russian government funded
: stuff and proclaim "good capitalist solution".
:
: Usual Parker Prevarication Elided
:
:
:What is left and what is right? I used to think ...

A pity you stopped doing that before you started posting here.


--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn